Tuesday, March 31, 2009

My Thoughts on Social Networking




Myspace was founded in 2003 and in 2006 was the most popular social networking site on the web. It’s competitor Facebook was created in 2004 as a spin off of a Harvard University project called Facemash. Two years ago everyone online was talking Myspace and last year everyone was talking Facebook. Having a chat to a lot of people who were users of these sites this year and there seems to be a universal grumble about advertising spam. Anyone who went public seems to have become a target for the usual annoying advertising pests. Moderated users who set up access controls seem to have been spared this invasion. The problem with regulating your access is that you limit your ability to actually socially interact with people that you don’t know but could find really interesting to communicate with. This is fine if you just want to share baby pic’s with family and friends or post your pic’s and experiences when travelling. Having looked briefly at Library Thing, although similar in public availability it hasn’t yet seemed to attract the same level of interest from insensitive advertising spammers. This cultivates an opportunity for people with common interests to find each other and share their experiences without fear of privacy invasion.. yet! I personally prefer Forums out of all the social networking sites. They don’t seem to have the fluff that sites like Facebook and Myspace have, they are more about information sharing and knowledge focused discussion.

My experience with the Gaming community has been that when a community of people with shared interests form their own social networking sites they seem to be a lot more successful than generic concept sites which go for mass usage. Ultimately someone pays to host these sites and you do inevitably get banner advertising and pop-ups in some form but it is easily ignored or switched off. You seem to get a more robust community if the community develops out of the necessity to communicate. I think this is why wiki’s have been such a successful social collaborative tool. People will naturally gravitate to their areas of interest or expertise and if they have something they feel confident in saying will contribute to these forums. I love Wikipedia, I use it constantly to source information for my online gaming and for general here and now thinking. I really like the way it’s uncensored, free and accessible. I like the way you don’t need to sign in and become a member if you’re only viewing information. I personally find sites that have a lot of restrictions and controls incredibly annoying and a waste of my time.

I am still out on Twitter and I can see the purpose in RSS Readers if you have an interestiin following certain sites and peoples activities. It seems to me that the online hype is allowing people to dream up all sorts of new ways to communicate and that the User will eventually filtered out the good from the bad and leave them lamenting. The one constant is that you are not going to be able to overcome people’s time constraints. Time and the amount of time invested into communication activities will always have some kind of boundaries.

2 comments:

  1. I agree with you about Wikipedia and how one of the reasons it is so successful is that you don't need to be a member to view it's content. Most of the social networking sites we have been looking at require an account to be set up. This discourages people from looking around the different sites and selecting the one which best suits them.

    I also agree with you that the best sites have been developed around interest groups, however, I don't feel I would be confortable meeting and talking with people I have not first met in person.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good points! I think it seems to be at the end of the day that there are so many ways to interact with people on the internet that you are able to pick and choose what suits you depending on your own ideas and reservations (such as knowing who you are interacting with).
    I agree also that a downside to sites such as facebook and myspace is the amount of fluff and advertising that is part of the page setup. One point I have noticed is that even though you are able to remove advertisements that you don't like; that doesn't mean that the level of advertising or fluff such as promotional materials, is actually reduced, it just changes to supposedly suit your needs. There can only ever be a limited amount that you can only have control over your own sites.
    Personally I am more of a facebook fan, mostly because I have been using it for so long now i think, and myspace seems just that bit more confusing to me. Forums are a good alternative to these sites and certainly help in terms of being developed around interest groups, maybe something to look into for our group?

    ReplyDelete